Kilotest: Violations of noscript element not equivalent?
issue for Russellville Park page
Basics
About the Russellville Park page
- URL: https://russellvillepark.com/
- Tested 11 days ago by job
kyqon 2026-05-21 at 23:58
About the noscript element not equivalent?
issue
- Why it matters: User who has disabled JavaScript may be denied some content
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 tool (WAVE)
- 7 violators were reported
Violators
Here are the HTML elements reported to violate rules belonging to the noscript element not equivalent?
issue.
Element 477
- XPath:
/html - Reported by WAVE
- XPath:
Element 241
- XPath:
/html/body /div[1] /footer[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /figure[2] /a[1] /div[1] /noscript[1] - Tag name:
NOSCRIPT - Reported by WAVE
- XPath:
Element 276
- XPath:
/html/body /div[1] /footer[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[4] /div[1] /div[1] /figure[1] /noscript[1] - Tag name:
NOSCRIPT - Reported by WAVE
- XPath:
Element 303
- XPath:
/html/body /div[1] /footer[2] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[2] /div[1] /figure[1] /a[1] /div[1] /noscript[1] - Tag name:
NOSCRIPT - Reported by WAVE
- XPath:
Element 340
- XPath:
/html/body /div[1] /footer[2] /div[1] /div[1] /div[1] /div[2] /div[1] /div[3] /div[1] /div[1] /figure[1] /noscript[1] - Tag name:
NOSCRIPT - Reported by WAVE
- XPath:
Element 70
- XPath:
/html/body /noscript[1] - Tag name:
NOSCRIPT - Reported by WAVE
- XPath:
Element 71
- XPath:
/html/body /noscript[2] - Tag name:
NOSCRIPT - Reported by WAVE
- XPath: