Issues reported for Mozilla Foundation join us

About the page

URL: https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/join-us/
Tested 29 days ago on 2026-10-12 at 21:46 by job 261012T2043-z78
Rule engines: 12 called, 11 able to test, violations reported by 10
Results: 1184 violations, 236 violators, 47 issues
Download the full technical report (JSON)

History

34 days ago (oldest)
30 days ago
29 days ago (latest; this report)

Request a retest

Issues reported

Highest priority: 12

button not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a button
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 5 rule engines (Axe + HTML CodeSniffer + Pour + QualWeb + SureA11y)
- Results: 5 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
iframe not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topic of an embedded page
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 3 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 3 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
control not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how to operate a form item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
invalid landmark child of navigation role
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
meta charset declared too late
- Why it matters: Browser may display incorrect text
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
parent invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot properly operate an item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
select element invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot properly select among options
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
attribute value invalid
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 12 violations, 6 violators
Where was the issue found?
attribute invalid
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
autocomplete missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help entering personal information in a form
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
Tab-focusable elements wrong
- Why it matters: Item selections by a keyboard-only user are useless or impossible
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 8 violations, 8 violators
Where was the issue found?
contrast poor
- Why it matters: Content is difficult to understand
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
Where was the issue found?

High priority: 9

form submission button missing
- Why it matters: User cannot easily submit a form
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.2
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer + QualWeb)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
visible label not in name
- Why it matters: User cannot get help choosing a form control to operate
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.3
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + SureA11y)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
forms not distinctly named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
role invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the nature of an item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
meta element duplicated
- Why it matters: Browser may process the page incorrectly
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
CSS invalid
- Why it matters: Page cannot be properly displayed
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
element closure invalid
- Why it matters: Page contains invalid code
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
element obsolete
- Why it matters: Page includes obsolete code that the browser may fail to process
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
small targets too near to each other
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 9 violations, 9 violators
Where was the issue found?

Low priority: 9

heading level skipped
- Why it matters: Helper misdescribes the page
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 3 rule engines (Axe + Html Checker API + Pour)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
main missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Axe + Pour)
- Results: 2 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
link indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot differentiate a link from plain text
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.3
- Reported by 2 rule engines (SureA11y + Testaro)
- Results: 4 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
heading structure illogical
- Why it matters: Helper misdescribes the page
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
title long
- Why it matters: Hovering makes an overly verbose explanation pop up
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
line height low
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 35 violations, 35 violators
Where was the issue found?
links named identically
- Why it matters: User cannot get help differentiating links
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 4 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
semantic properties represented with styles
- Why it matters: User cannot get help to fully understand the text
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
focus indication improvable
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot easily choose an item to operate
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.7
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 52 violations, 52 violators
Where was the issue found?

Lowest priority: 17

text contrast improvable
- Why it matters: Content is not easy to understand
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.6
- Reported by 6 rule engines (ASLint + Axe + HTML CodeSniffer + Pour + QualWeb + SureA11y)
- Results: 820 violations, 35 violators
Where was the issue found?
content beyond landmarks
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 3 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Axe + Pour)
- Results: 75 violations, 60 violators
Where was the issue found?
tab-opening link action unstated?
- Why it matters: Following a link opens a new window, possibly surprising a user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.5
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + Pour + Testaro)
- Results: 37 violations, 26 violators
Where was the issue found?
role redundant
- Why it matters: Page includes unnecessary code
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Pour)
- Results: 2 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
button name not visible
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a button
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
fieldset missing?
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help recognizing a group of related form items
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
Where was the issue found?
labeling risky
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand a form control
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 13 violations, 13 violators
Where was the issue found?
no default option
- Why it matters: User may risk erroneously submitting a form
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
Where was the issue found?
position sticky
- Why it matters: User may be unable to see needed content or may be forced to scroll in both dimensions
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.10
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
link name vague
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand what a link points to
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Pour)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
target small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Pour)
- Results: 24 violations, 24 violators
Where was the issue found?
label location dubious
- Why it matters: User may fail to notice the explanation of an item in a form
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
all-italic text
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
large visible-element count
- Why it matters: User cannot easily find items in the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
role assigned instead of implicit
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand the purpose of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
inconsistent heading, link, or button styles
- Why it matters: User cannot easily distinguish items of different types
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 5 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
z-index not zero
- Why it matters: User cannot predict the effect of clicking
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
Where was the issue found?

What you can do

Choose how to address these issues:

Do it yourself

Explore the issues, following the links above. Decide which issues are actual defects. Plan and implement corrections. Then retest the page.

Use artificial intelligence

Make Kilotest available to an AI assistant. Then give it a prompt like this:

Kilotest reports issues on the Mozilla Foundation join us web page. Describe them and propose a plan to resolve the genuine defects.

Issues reported for Mozilla Foundation join us

About the page

History

Issues reported

button not named

iframe not named

control not named

invalid landmark child of navigation role

meta charset declared too late

parent invalid

select element invalid

attribute value invalid

attribute invalid

autocomplete missing

Tab-focusable elements wrong

contrast poor

form submission button missing

visible label not in name

forms not distinctly named

role invalid

meta element duplicated

CSS invalid

element closure invalid

element obsolete

small targets too near to each other

heading level skipped

main missing

link indication poor

heading structure illogical

title long

line height low

links named identically

semantic properties represented with styles

focus indication improvable

text contrast improvable

content beyond landmarks

tab-opening link action unstated?

role redundant

button name not visible

fieldset missing?

labeling risky

no default option

position sticky

link name vague

target small

label location dubious

all-italic text

large visible-element count

role assigned instead of implicit

inconsistent heading, link, or button styles

z-index not zero

What you can do

Do it yourself

Use artificial intelligence