Issues reported for Rainforest Alliance subscribe
About the page
- URL: https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/subscribe/
- Tested 29 days ago on 2026-10-12 at 21:25 by job
261012T2043-mcs - Rule engines: 12 called, 10 able to test, violations reported by 10
- Results: 3040 violations, 1412 violators, 61 issues
- Download the full technical report (JSON)
History
- 31 days ago (oldest)
- 30 days ago
- 29 days ago (latest; this report)
Issues reported
Highest priority: 14
-
link not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help understanding what a link points to
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 6 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Alfa + Axe + Pour + QualWeb + SureA11y)
- Results: 12 violations, 5 violators
-
control not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how to operate a form item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 6 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Alfa + Axe + Pour + QualWeb + SureA11y)
- Results: 18 violations, 7 violators
-
svg image not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help understanding an image
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + ASLint)
- Results: 14 violations, 14 violators
-
contrast poor
- Why it matters: Content is difficult to understand
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Alfa + Pour)
- Results: 253 violations, 5 violators
-
ID not unique
- Why it matters: User may be pointed to the wrong item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 15 violations, 11 violators
-
dialog not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a pop-up window
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 9 violations, 1 violator
-
attribute value invalid
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
link element misplaced
- Why it matters: Page fails to get a needed external resource
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
attribute invalid
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
attribute missing
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
fatal error
- Why it matters: Page prevents testing for accessibility
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
image not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help to know what is in an image
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
-
autocomplete missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help entering personal information in a form
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 25 violations, 25 violators
-
Tab-focusable elements wrong
- Why it matters: Item selections by a keyboard-only user are useless or impossible
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
High priority: 16
-
form submission button missing
- Why it matters: User cannot easily submit a form
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.2
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
-
heading empty
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topic of a part of the page
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.6
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
element in head invalid
- Why it matters: Browser processes the page improperly
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + Testaro)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
landmarks not distinctly named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Axe + Pour)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
-
code obsolete
- Why it matters: Page contains code that is no longer standard
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
role invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the nature of an item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 12 violations, 6 violators
-
navigations not distinctly named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
label empty
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topics of form items
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
code invalid
- Why it matters: Invalid code in the page may prevent a helper from working
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
invalid CSS at-rule
- Why it matters: Page cannot be properly displayed in particular contexts
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
element closure invalid
- Why it matters: Page contains invalid code
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
group not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topic of a group of form items
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 8 violations, 8 violators
-
box size absolute
- Why it matters: User cannot enlarge the content of an item for readability
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
-
font small
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
small targets too near to each other
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 15 violations, 15 violators
-
element focusability and operability conflict
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot operate an item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 13 violations, 13 violators
Low priority: 10
-
legend missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topic of a group of form items
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + Pour + QualWeb)
- Results: 17 violations, 9 violators
-
fieldset missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help recognizing a group of related form items
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Testaro)
- Results: 12 violations, 7 violators
-
link href missing
- Why it matters: Helper cannot properly explain a link to a user
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + Testaro)
- Results: 13 violations, 11 violators
-
multiple banners
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Axe)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
links not grouped as nav
- Why it matters: User cannot get help identifying links as a navigation tool
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
label types incompatible
- Why it matters: User cannot get reliable help on the topics of form items
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 7 violations, 7 violators
-
line height low
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 36 violations, 36 violators
-
links named identically
- Why it matters: User cannot get help differentiating links
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 5 violations, 1 violator
-
link indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot differentiate a link from plain text
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
-
focus indication improvable
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot easily choose an item to operate
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.7
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 9 violations, 9 violators
Lowest priority: 21
-
text contrast improvable
- Why it matters: Content is not easy to understand
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.6
- Reported by 7 rule engines (Alfa + ASLint + Axe + HTML CodeSniffer + Pour + QualWeb + SureA11y)
- Results: 1526 violations, 845 violators
-
tab-opening link action unstated?
- Why it matters: Following a link opens a new window, possibly surprising a user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.5
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + Pour + Testaro)
- Results: 275 violations, 181 violators
-
target small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Alfa + Pour)
- Results: 33 violations, 33 violators
-
complementary not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
false aria-hidden value risky
- Why it matters: User may be misled by erroneously hidden or revealed page content
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
button name not visible
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a button
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
title attribute empty
- Why it matters: Hovering does not get the promised explanation of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 7 violations, 4 violators
-
fieldset missing?
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help recognizing a group of related form items
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 25 violations, 25 violators
-
labeling risky
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand a form control
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
-
tabindex positive
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot predict the navigation sequence
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
no default option
- Why it matters: User may risk erroneously submitting a form
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
link destination not URL
- Why it matters: Helper cannot properly explain a link to a user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 7 violations, 7 violators
-
aria attribute redundant
- Why it matters: Page includes unnecessary code
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Pour)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
tabindex redundant
- Why it matters: Revision risks interfering with navigation by a keyboard-only user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Pour)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
text contrast not testable
- Why it matters: Text may be difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
all-capital text
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 23 violations, 23 violators
-
large visible-element count
- Why it matters: User cannot easily find items in the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
role assigned instead of implicit
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand the purpose of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 13 violations, 13 violators
-
inconsistent heading, link, or button styles
- Why it matters: User cannot easily distinguish items of different types
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 3 violations, 1 violator
-
title attribute invalid
- Why it matters: User gets too little, too much, or repeated help explaining an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 479 violations, 479 violators
-
z-index not zero
- Why it matters: User cannot predict the effect of clicking
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 83 violations, 83 violators
What you can do
Choose how to address these issues:
Do it yourself
Explore the issues, following the links above. Decide which issues are actual defects. Plan and implement corrections. Then retest the page.
Use artificial intelligence
Make Kilotest available to an AI assistant. Then give it a prompt like this:
Kilotest reports issues on the Rainforest Alliance subscribe web page. Describe them and propose a plan to resolve the genuine defects.