Issues reported for Disability Rights Advocates home
About the page
- URL: https://dralegal.org/
- Tested 30 days ago on 2026-10-11 at 22:16 by job
261011T2211-81f - Rule engines: 12 called, 11 able to test, violations reported by 10
- Results: 393 violations, 244 violators, 35 issues
- Download the full technical report (JSON)
History
- 198 days ago (oldest)
- 34 days ago
- 30 days ago (latest; this report)
Issues reported
Highest priority: 7
-
ID not unique
- Why it matters: User may be pointed to the wrong item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + Html Checker API)
- Results: 54 violations, 42 violators
-
contrast poor
- Why it matters: Content is difficult to understand
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 2 rule engines (SureA11y + WAVE)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
-
no role-required name
- Why it matters: User cannot get help understanding an item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
iframe not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topic of an embedded page
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
attribute value invalid
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 5 violations, 4 violators
-
target empty
- Why it matters: Item is displayed improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
-
autocomplete missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help entering personal information in a form
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
High priority: 12
-
heading empty
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topic of a part of the page
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.6
- Reported by 6 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + ASLint + Axe + HTML CodeSniffer + Pour + WAVE)
- Results: 6 violations, 2 violators
-
element obsolete
- Why it matters: Page includes obsolete code that the browser may fail to process
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + QualWeb)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
landmarks not distinctly named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Axe + Pour)
- Results: 6 violations, 4 violators
-
navigations not distinctly named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
code obsolete
- Why it matters: Page contains code that is no longer standard
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
-
forms not distinctly named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
attribute obsolete
- Why it matters: Page includes obsolete code that the browser may fail to process
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
CSS invalid
- Why it matters: Page cannot be properly displayed
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
autocomplete invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot get help entering personal information in a form item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
visible label not in name
- Why it matters: User cannot get help choosing a form control to operate
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
-
box size absolute
- Why it matters: User cannot enlarge the content of an item for readability
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 8 violations, 8 violators
-
small targets too near to each other
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 27 violations, 27 violators
Low priority: 4
-
not exactly 1 h1 heading
- Why it matters: User cannot understand the topic of the page
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + Axe + Pour)
- Results: 3 violations, 1 violator
-
heading structure illogical
- Why it matters: Helper misdescribes the page
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 2 violations, 1 violator
-
title long
- Why it matters: Hovering makes an overly verbose explanation pop up
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
line height low
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 16 violations, 16 violators
Lowest priority: 12
-
text contrast improvable
- Why it matters: Content is not easy to understand
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.6
- Reported by 6 rule engines (ASLint + Axe + HTML CodeSniffer + Pour + QualWeb + SureA11y)
- Results: 156 violations, 88 violators
-
role redundant
- Why it matters: Page includes unnecessary code
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Pour)
- Results: 8 violations, 5 violators
-
fieldset missing?
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help recognizing a group of related form items
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
labeling risky
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand a form control
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
no default option
- Why it matters: User may risk erroneously submitting a form
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 4 violations, 3 violators
-
target small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Pour)
- Results: 22 violations, 22 violators
-
container size unit not percentage
- Why it matters: User may be unable to see all of an item without scrolling in both dimensions
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.10
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 9 violations, 1 violator
-
all-italic text
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
large visible-element count
- Why it matters: User cannot easily find items in the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
role assigned instead of implicit
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand the purpose of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
-
inconsistent heading, link, or button styles
- Why it matters: User cannot easily distinguish items of different types
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 5 violations, 1 violator
-
z-index not zero
- Why it matters: User cannot predict the effect of clicking
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 13 violations, 13 violators
What you can do
Choose how to address these issues:
Do it yourself
Explore the issues, following the links above. Decide which issues are actual defects. Plan and implement corrections. Then retest the page.
Use artificial intelligence
Make Kilotest available to an AI assistant. Then give it a prompt like this:
Kilotest reports issues on the Disability Rights Advocates home web page. Describe them and propose a plan to resolve the genuine defects.