Issues reported for Animal Welfare Institute contact
About the page
- URL: https://awionline.org/about-us/contact-us/
- Tested 30 days ago on 2026-10-11 at 22:12 by job
261011T2211-3sb - Rule engines: 12 called, 11 able to test, violations reported by 10
- Results: 682 violations, 186 violators, 34 issues
- Download the full technical report (JSON)
History
- 34 days ago (oldest)
- 30 days ago (latest; this report)
Issues reported
Highest priority: 7
-
ID not unique
- Why it matters: User may be pointed to the wrong item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + Html Checker API + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 4 violations, 3 violators
-
svg image not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help understanding an image
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + ASLint)
- Results: 5 violations, 4 violators
-
contrast poor
- Why it matters: Content is difficult to understand
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Pour + WAVE)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
option not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help to understand an option
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
autocomplete missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help entering personal information in a form
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
-
Tab-focusable elements wrong
- Why it matters: Item selections by a keyboard-only user are useless or impossible
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 45 violations, 45 violators
-
image not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help to know what is in an image
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
High priority: 9
-
control child of link or button
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 4 rule engines (Html Checker API + Pour + SureA11y + Testaro)
- Results: 4 violations, 2 violators
-
forms not distinctly named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
invalid CSS at-rule
- Why it matters: Page cannot be properly displayed in particular contexts
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 5 violations, 1 violator
-
autocomplete invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot get help entering personal information in a form item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
code invalid
- Why it matters: Invalid code in the page may prevent a helper from working
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
box size absolute
- Why it matters: User cannot enlarge the content of an item for readability
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
small targets too near to each other
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 15 violations, 15 violators
-
input has placeholder instead of name
- Why it matters: User cannot get reliable help on what information to enter in a form item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
hover indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot explore the page reliably with a mouse
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 6 violations, 3 violators
Low priority: 6
-
heading level skipped
- Why it matters: Helper misdescribes the page
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 3 rule engines (Axe + Html Checker API + Pour)
- Results: 3 violations, 1 violator
-
link indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot differentiate a link from plain text
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.3
- Reported by 2 rule engines (SureA11y + Testaro)
- Results: 5 violations, 4 violators
-
heading structure illogical
- Why it matters: Helper misdescribes the page
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
line height low
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 45 violations, 45 violators
-
links named identically
- Why it matters: User cannot get help differentiating links
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 2 violations, 1 violator
-
focus indication improvable
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot easily choose an item to operate
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.7
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 16 violations, 16 violators
Lowest priority: 12
-
text contrast improvable
- Why it matters: Content is not easy to understand
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.6
- Reported by 6 rule engines (ASLint + Axe + HTML CodeSniffer + Pour + QualWeb + SureA11y)
- Results: 405 violations, 59 violators
-
tab-opening link action unstated?
- Why it matters: Following a link opens a new window, possibly surprising a user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.5
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + Pour + Testaro)
- Results: 34 violations, 26 violators
-
label location dubious
- Why it matters: User may fail to notice the explanation of an item in a form
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + QualWeb)
- Results: 12 violations, 7 violators
-
button name not visible
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a button
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 7 violations, 7 violators
-
fieldset missing?
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help recognizing a group of related form items
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
no default option
- Why it matters: User may risk erroneously submitting a form
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
target small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Pour)
- Results: 26 violations, 26 violators
-
all-capital text
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
large visible-element count
- Why it matters: User cannot easily find items in the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
inconsistent heading, link, or button styles
- Why it matters: User cannot easily distinguish items of different types
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 4 violations, 1 violator
-
z-index not zero
- Why it matters: User cannot predict the effect of clicking
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 11 violations, 11 violators
-
hovering changes content
- Why it matters: User cannot explore the page reliably with a mouse
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
What you can do
Choose how to address these issues:
Do it yourself
Explore the issues, following the links above. Decide which issues are actual defects. Plan and implement corrections. Then retest the page.
Use artificial intelligence
Make Kilotest available to an AI assistant. Then give it a prompt like this:
Kilotest reports issues on the Animal Welfare Institute contact web page. Describe them and propose a plan to resolve the genuine defects.