Kilotest: Issues reported for National Coalition Against Censorship contact
About the tests
How to deal with the issues
Do it yourself
Explore the issues below in as much detail as you want. Decide which ones are actual defects. Plan and implement corrections.
Or use AI
Make Kilotest available to your AI assistant. There are step-by-step instructions for this.
After that, you can ask:
Kilotest reports defects on the National Coalition Against Censorship contact web page. Summarize them and propose a plan to resolve the genuine ones.
- URL: https://ncac.org/contact
- Tested 2 days ago on 2026-10-07 at 21:57 by job
261007T2138-czm - Summary of results:
- Rule engines:
- Called: 12
- Were able to test: 12
- Reported any rule violations: 11
- Violations: 426
- Violators: 171
- Issues: 41
- Rule engines:
- Download the full technical report (JSON)
History
This is the only report about the page.
Should Kilotest retest the page?
Issues reported
Highest priority: 8
-
contrast poor
- Why it matters: Content is difficult to understand
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 6 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Alfa + Axe + Pour + SureA11y + WAVE)
- Violations: 38
- Violators: 13
-
control not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how to operate a form item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (HTML CodeSniffer + WAVE)
- Violations: 16
- Violators: 10
-
requirement invalid
- Why it matters: User may fail to get help determining whether a form item must be completed
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 2
-
attribute invalid
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Violations: 8
- Violators: 8
-
parent invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot properly operate an item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
input not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on what information to enter in a form item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Violations: 10
- Violators: 10
-
autocomplete missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help entering personal information in a form
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 2
-
Tab-focusable elements wrong
- Why it matters: Item selections by a keyboard-only user are useless or impossible
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 50
- Violators: 50
High priority: 7
-
landmarks not distinctly named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Axe + Pour)
- Violations: 3
- Violators: 2
-
code obsolete
- Why it matters: Page contains code that is no longer standard
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 2
-
contentinfos not distinctly named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 2
-
form submission button missing
- Why it matters: User cannot easily submit a form
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 2
-
CSS invalid
- Why it matters: Page cannot be properly displayed
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 1
-
input has placeholder instead of name
- Why it matters: User cannot get reliable help on what information to enter in a form item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 11
- Violators: 11
-
element focusability and operability conflict
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot operate an item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 8
- Violators: 8
Low priority: 8
-
link indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot differentiate a link from plain text
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.3
- Reported by 5 rule engines (Alfa + Axe + Pour + SureA11y + Testaro)
- Violations: 23
- Violators: 9
-
multiple contentinfos
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 3 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Axe + QualWeb)
- Violations: 5
- Violators: 2
-
link href missing
- Why it matters: Helper cannot properly explain a link to a user
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + Testaro)
- Violations: 5
- Violators: 5
-
label types incompatible
- Why it matters: User cannot get reliable help on the topics of form items
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 2
-
line height low
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 4
- Violators: 4
-
links named identically
- Why it matters: User cannot get help differentiating links
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 1
-
page content moves spontaneously
- Why it matters: Motion-sensitive user may suffer harm
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.2.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
focus indication improvable
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot easily choose an item to operate
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.7
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 25
- Violators: 25
Lowest priority: 18
-
text contrast improvable
- Why it matters: Content is not easy to understand
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.6
- Reported by 7 rule engines (Alfa + ASLint + Axe + HTML CodeSniffer + Pour + QualWeb + SureA11y)
- Violations: 58
- Violators: 21
-
tab-opening link action unstated?
- Why it matters: Following a link opens a new window, possibly surprising a user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.5
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + Pour + Testaro)
- Violations: 32
- Violators: 18
-
target small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Alfa + Pour)
- Violations: 11
- Violators: 11
-
link name vague
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand what a link points to
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + Pour)
- Violations: 5
- Violators: 5
-
button name not visible
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a button
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 9
- Violators: 9
-
title attribute empty
- Why it matters: Hovering does not get the promised explanation of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 4
- Violators: 1
-
fieldset missing?
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help recognizing a group of related form items
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 12
- Violators: 12
-
labeling risky
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand a form control
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 12
- Violators: 12
-
link destination not URL
- Why it matters: Helper cannot properly explain a link to a user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 4
- Violators: 4
-
name dubiously mouse-specific
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand how to activate a link
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 2
-
text contrast not testable
- Why it matters: Text may be difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Violations: 6
- Violators: 6
-
all-capital text
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
double br use dubious
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help to fully understand the text
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
role assigned instead of implicit
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand the purpose of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 4
- Violators: 4
-
inconsistent heading, link, or button styles
- Why it matters: User cannot easily distinguish items of different types
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 3
- Violators: 1
-
title attribute invalid
- Why it matters: User gets too little, too much, or repeated help explaining an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 9
- Violators: 9
-
z-index not zero
- Why it matters: User cannot predict the effect of clicking
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 28
- Violators: 28
-
hovering changes content
- Why it matters: User cannot explore the page reliably with a mouse
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1