Kilotest: Issues reported for Institute for Progress US Energy Data Electricity Demand
About the tests
How to deal with the issues
Do it yourself
Explore the issues below in as much detail as you want. Decide which ones are actual defects. Plan and implement corrections.
Or use AI
Make Kilotest available to your AI assistant. There are step-by-step instructions for this.
After that, you can ask:
Kilotest reports defects on the Institute for Progress US Energy Data Electricity Demand web page. Summarize them and propose a plan to resolve the genuine ones.
- URL: https://usenergydata.org/electricity-demand/
- Tested 2 days ago on 2026-10-07 at 21:52 by job
261007T2132-e35 - Summary of results:
- Rule engines:
- Called: 12
- Were able to test: 11
- Reported any rule violations: 10
- Violations: 1524
- Violators: 204
- Issues: 40
- Rule engines:
- Download the full technical report (JSON)
History
This is the only report about the page.
Should Kilotest retest the page?
Issues reported
Highest priority: 7
-
contrast poor
- Why it matters: Content is difficult to understand
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 6 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Alfa + Axe + Pour + SureA11y + WAVE)
- Violations: 264
- Violators: 63
-
control not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how to operate a form item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 6 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Alfa + HTML CodeSniffer + Pour + QualWeb + WAVE)
- Violations: 30
- Violators: 6
-
svg image not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help understanding an image
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + ASLint)
- Violations: 56
- Violators: 15
-
input not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on what information to enter in a form item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
description list orphan
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on whether an item is in a list
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Violations: 60
- Violators: 1
-
autocomplete missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help entering personal information in a form
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
image not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help to know what is in an image
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Violations: 8
- Violators: 8
High priority: 11
-
code obsolete
- Why it matters: Page contains code that is no longer standard
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Violations: 6
- Violators: 6
-
role invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the nature of an item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
target very small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Alfa)
- Violations: 12
- Violators: 6
-
attribute obsolete
- Why it matters: Page includes obsolete code that the browser may fail to process
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 6
- Violators: 6
-
table not marked as such
- Why it matters: Helper misinforms a user about whether items are cells of a table
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Violations: 3
- Violators: 1
-
box size absolute
- Why it matters: User cannot enlarge the content of an item for readability
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Violations: 93
- Violators: 7
-
font small
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
small targets too near to each other
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 16
- Violators: 16
-
input has placeholder instead of name
- Why it matters: User cannot get reliable help on what information to enter in a form item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
element focusability and operability conflict
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot operate an item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
hover indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot explore the page reliably with a mouse
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 6
- Violators: 4
Low priority: 8
-
main missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Axe + Pour)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 1
-
font size absolute
- Why it matters: User cannot adjust the text size for readability
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Alfa)
- Violations: 32
- Violators: 13
-
cell headers ambiguous?
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help on relationships in a table
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Violations: 3
- Violators: 1
-
table misused
- Why it matters: Helper misinforms a user about whether items are cells of a table
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Violations: 3
- Violators: 1
-
line height low
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 17
- Violators: 17
-
links named identically
- Why it matters: User cannot get help differentiating links
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
fieldset missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help recognizing a group of related form items
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 2
-
focus indication improvable
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot easily choose an item to operate
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.7
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 37
- Violators: 37
Lowest priority: 14
-
text contrast improvable
- Why it matters: Content is not easy to understand
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.6
- Reported by 7 rule engines (Alfa + ASLint + Axe + HTML CodeSniffer + Pour + QualWeb + SureA11y)
- Violations: 259
- Violators: 104
-
content beyond landmarks
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 4 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Alfa + Axe + Pour)
- Violations: 434
- Violators: 112
-
tab-opening link action unstated?
- Why it matters: Following a link opens a new window, possibly surprising a user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.5
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + Pour + Testaro)
- Violations: 24
- Violators: 16
-
target small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Alfa + Pour)
- Violations: 84
- Violators: 46
-
all-capital text
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Alfa + Testaro)
- Violations: 9
- Violators: 9
-
fieldset missing?
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help recognizing a group of related form items
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 2
- Violators: 2
-
labeling risky
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand a form control
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 4
- Violators: 4
-
position sticky
- Why it matters: User may be unable to see needed content or may be forced to scroll in both dimensions
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.10
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
text contrast not testable
- Why it matters: Text may be difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Violations: 14
- Violators: 14
-
table caption missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topic of a table
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Violations: 3
- Violators: 1
-
label location dubious
- Why it matters: User may fail to notice the explanation of an item in a form
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Violations: 15
- Violators: 2
-
role assigned instead of implicit
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand the purpose of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 1
- Violators: 1
-
inconsistent heading, link, or button styles
- Why it matters: User cannot easily distinguish items of different types
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 4
- Violators: 1
-
z-index not zero
- Why it matters: User cannot predict the effect of clicking
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Violations: 7
- Violators: 7