Issues reported for Go Portland Go coalition
About the page
- URL: https://www.goportlandgo.org/coalition
- Tested 76 days ago on 2026-08-27 at 01:02 by job
260826T2015-xr7 - Rule engines: 10 called, 10 able to test, violations reported by 10
- Results: 1300 violations, 992 violators, 53 issues
- Download the full technical report (JSON)
History
This is the only available report about the page.
Issues reported
Highest priority: 12
-
contrast poor
- Why it matters: Content is difficult to understand
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 3 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Axe + WAVE)
- Results: 21 violations, 15 violators
-
ID not unique
- Why it matters: User may be pointed to the wrong item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 370 violations, 277 violators
-
svg image not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help understanding an image
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
-
requirement invalid
- Why it matters: User may fail to get help determining whether a form item must be completed
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
attribute invalid
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 6 violations, 5 violators
-
attribute value invalid
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
image not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help to know what is in an image
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
parent invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot properly operate an item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
fatal error
- Why it matters: Page prevents testing for accessibility
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
link element misplaced
- Why it matters: Page fails to get a needed external resource
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
autocomplete missing
- Why it matters: User cannot get help entering personal information in a form
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
control not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how to operate a form item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
High priority: 10
-
font small
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + WAVE)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
-
code obsolete
- Why it matters: Page contains code that is no longer standard
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
role invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the nature of an item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
focusable element not active
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot navigate properly to the operable items
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Axe)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
meta X-UA-Compatible incomplete
- Why it matters: Internet Explorer may display the page incorrectly
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
code invalid
- Why it matters: Invalid code in the page may prevent a helper from working
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
element closure invalid
- Why it matters: Page contains invalid code
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 3 violations, 2 violators
-
small targets too near to each other
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 14 violations, 14 violators
-
element focusability and operability conflict
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot operate an item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
hover indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot explore the page reliably with a mouse
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
Low priority: 8
-
heading level skipped
- Why it matters: Helper misdescribes the page
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 4 rule engines (Alfa + Axe + Editoria11y + WAVE)
- Results: 8 violations, 4 violators
-
line height low
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.8
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Alfa + Testaro)
- Results: 83 violations, 83 violators
-
links named identically
- Why it matters: User cannot get help differentiating links
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 2 rule engines (QualWeb + Testaro)
- Results: 5 violations, 3 violators
-
heading heads nothing
- Why it matters: Helper misdescribes the page
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Alfa)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
heading structure illogical
- Why it matters: Helper misdescribes the page
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
-
duplicate attribute
- Why it matters: Browser processes the page improperly
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 10 violations, 1 violator
-
focus indication improvable
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot easily choose an item to operate
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.7
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
adjacent links not combined
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user expends extra effort to skip a link
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Lowest priority: 23
-
text contrast improvable
- Why it matters: Content is not easy to understand
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.6
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer + QualWeb)
- Results: 40 violations, 35 violators
-
hr misused
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the nature of segments of the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + Testaro)
- Results: 172 violations, 172 violators
-
heading-like styles dubious
- Why it matters: User may be unable to understand the topic of a part of the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Editoria11y + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 111 violations, 60 violators
-
text contrast not testable
- Why it matters: Text may be difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 2 rule engines (HTML CodeSniffer + QualWeb)
- Results: 8 violations, 7 violators
-
role redundant
- Why it matters: Page includes unnecessary code
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
aria attribute redundant
- Why it matters: Page includes unnecessary code
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
target small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Alfa)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
button name not visible
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a button
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 4 violations, 3 violators
-
labeling risky
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand a form control
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
heading abnormally long
- Why it matters: User has difficulty understanding the topic of a part of the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Editoria11y)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
-
type redundant
- Why it matters: Page includes unnecessary code
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
-
image dubiously marked decorative
- Why it matters: Helper ignores an image that is apparently informative
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
-
position sticky
- Why it matters: User may be unable to see needed content or may be forced to scroll in both dimensions
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.10
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
-
overflow hidden?
- Why it matters: User may be unable to enlarge the text for readability
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 119 violations, 119 violators
-
label location dubious
- Why it matters: User may fail to notice the explanation of an item in a form
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
all-capital text
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 50 violations, 50 violators
-
large visible-element count
- Why it matters: User cannot easily find items in the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
text distortion
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
-
double br use dubious
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help to fully understand the text
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
role assigned instead of implicit
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand the purpose of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
inconsistent heading, link, or button styles
- Why it matters: User cannot easily distinguish items of different types
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 3 violations, 1 violator
-
z-index not zero
- Why it matters: User cannot predict the effect of clicking
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 190 violations, 190 violators
-
noscript element not equivalent?
- Why it matters: User who has disabled JavaScript may be denied some content
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
What you can do
Choose how to address these issues:
Do it yourself
Explore the issues, following the links above. Decide which issues are actual defects. Plan and implement corrections. Then retest the page.
Use artificial intelligence
Make Kilotest available to an AI assistant. Then give it a prompt like this:
Kilotest reports issues on the Go Portland Go coalition web page. Describe them and propose a plan to resolve the genuine defects.