Issues reported for Jim Slavik about
About the page
- URL: https://www.jimslavik.com/about
- Tested 138 days ago on 2026-06-25 at 19:23 by job
260625T1923-7fj - Rule engines: 10 called, 9 able to test, violations reported by 6
- Results: 121 violations, 64 violators, 16 issues
- Download the full technical report (JSON)
History
This is the only available report about the page.
Issues reported
Highest priority: 0
- None
High priority: 2
-
box size absolute
- Why it matters: User cannot enlarge the content of an item for readability
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
small targets too near to each other
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
Low priority: 2
-
line height low
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.8
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Alfa + Testaro)
- Results: 27 violations, 25 violators
-
focus indication improvable
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot easily choose an item to operate
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.7
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 16 violations, 16 violators
Lowest priority: 12
-
target small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Alfa)
- Results: 13 violations, 9 violators
-
button name not visible
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a button
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
custom button keyboard-inoperable?
- Why it matters: Custom item may prevent a keyboard-only user from operating it
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 6 violations, 3 violators
-
tabindex redundant
- Why it matters: Revision risks interfering with navigation by a keyboard-only user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 6 violations, 3 violators
-
position sticky
- Why it matters: User may be unable to see needed content or may be forced to scroll in both dimensions
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.10
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
text contrast improvable
- Why it matters: Content is not easy to understand
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Axe)
- Results: 20 violations, 20 violators
-
text contrast not testable
- Why it matters: Text may be difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
-
all-capital text
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 7 violations, 7 violators
-
text distortion
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
-
role assigned instead of implicit
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand the purpose of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
-
inconsistent heading, link, or button styles
- Why it matters: User cannot easily distinguish items of different types
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 2 violations, 1 violator
-
z-index not zero
- Why it matters: User cannot predict the effect of clicking
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
What you can do
Choose how to address these issues:
Do it yourself
Explore the issues, following the links above. Decide which issues are actual defects. Plan and implement corrections. Then retest the page.
Use artificial intelligence
Make Kilotest available to an AI assistant. Then give it a prompt like this:
Kilotest reports issues on the Jim Slavik about web page. Describe them and propose a plan to resolve the genuine defects.