Issues reported for State of Oregon web accessibility

About the page

URL: https://www.oregon.gov/pages/accessibility.aspx
Tested 178 days ago on 2026-05-16 at 21:00 by job 260516T2042-9br
Rule engines: 10 called, 10 able to test, violations reported by 9
Results: 934 violations, 687 violators, 54 issues
Download the full technical report (JSON)

History

This is the only available report about the page.

Request a retest

Issues reported

Highest priority: 15

contrast poor
- Why it matters: Content is difficult to understand
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 4 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Axe + HTML CodeSniffer + WAVE)
- Results: 65 violations, 47 violators
Where was the issue found?
iframe not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topic of an embedded page
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 3 rule engines (Alfa + ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
control not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how to operate a form item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 3 rule engines (Alfa + HTML CodeSniffer + WAVE)
- Results: 15 violations, 6 violators
Where was the issue found?
internal link broken
- Why it matters: User cannot reach a promised page location
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer + WAVE)
- Results: 6 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
svg image not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help understanding an image
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + ASLint)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
Where was the issue found?
dialog not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a pop-up window
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
label reference invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot get help understanding an item in a form
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
list child invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on which items are in a list
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Axe)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
script element invalidly deferred
- Why it matters: Browser processes the page improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
attribute value invalid
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 2 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
parent invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot properly operate an item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
input not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on what information to enter in a form item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
Where was the issue found?
aria attribute invalid
- Why it matters: Item behavior violates user expectations
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
Tab-focusable elements wrong
- Why it matters: Item selections by a keyboard-only user are useless or impossible
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
aria reference invalid
- Why it matters: Item behavior violates user expectations
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?

High priority: 6

attribute obsolete
- Why it matters: Page includes obsolete code that the browser may fail to process
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + Html Checker API)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
Where was the issue found?
form submission button missing
- Why it matters: User cannot easily submit a form
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.2
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
code obsolete
- Why it matters: Page contains code that is no longer standard
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
animation long or repetitive
- Why it matters: Motion-sensitive user may suffer harm
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.2.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
element obsolete
- Why it matters: Page includes obsolete code that the browser may fail to process
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
hover indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot explore the page reliably with a mouse
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?

Low priority: 6

links named identically
- Why it matters: User cannot get help differentiating links
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
links not grouped as nav
- Why it matters: User cannot get help identifying links as a navigation tool
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
line height low
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.8
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 12 violations, 12 violators
Where was the issue found?
link indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot differentiate a link from plain text
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 58 violations, 58 violators
Where was the issue found?
semantic properties represented with styles
- Why it matters: User cannot get help to fully understand the text
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
adjacent links not combined
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user expends extra effort to skip a link
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?

Lowest priority: 27

text contrast improvable
- Why it matters: Content is not easy to understand
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.6
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + Axe + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 96 violations, 85 violators
Where was the issue found?
tab-opening link action unstated?
- Why it matters: Following a link opens a new window, possibly surprising a user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.5
- Reported by 2 rule engines (ASLint + Testaro)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
target small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Alfa)
- Results: 3 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
content beyond landmarks
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Alfa)
- Results: 3 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
item makes testing inconclusive
- Why it matters: Item prevents a conclusive accessibility test
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Alfa)
- Results: 16 violations, 7 violators
Where was the issue found?
button name not visible
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a button
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 3 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
title attribute empty
- Why it matters: Hovering does not get the promised explanation of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 33 violations, 33 violators
Where was the issue found?
labeling risky
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand a form control
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 6 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
tabindex redundant
- Why it matters: Revision risks interfering with navigation by a keyboard-only user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
Where was the issue found?
no default option
- Why it matters: User may risk erroneously submitting a form
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
link destination not URL
- Why it matters: Helper cannot properly explain a link to a user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 47 violations, 36 violators
Where was the issue found?
image dubiously named
- Why it matters: Helper may describe an image inadequately
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 6 violations, 5 violators
Where was the issue found?
links dubiously share name
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help differentiating links
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Axe)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
type redundant
- Why it matters: Page includes unnecessary code
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
aria-label on non-labelable role
- Why it matters: User is misinformed about an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
image dubiously marked decorative
- Why it matters: Helper ignores an image that is apparently informative
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
option groups not marked?
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help recognizing groups of options
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
position sticky
- Why it matters: User may be unable to see needed content or may be forced to scroll in both dimensions
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.10
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 6 violations, 6 violators
Where was the issue found?
text contrast not testable
- Why it matters: Text may be difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 413 violations, 413 violators
Where was the issue found?
image link text suspect
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user may misunderstand the effect of following a link
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
all-capital text
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
large visible-element count
- Why it matters: User cannot easily find items in the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
text distortion
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 16 violations, 16 violators
Where was the issue found?
role assigned instead of implicit
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand the purpose of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
inconsistent heading, link, or button styles
- Why it matters: User cannot easily distinguish items of different types
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 5 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
title attribute invalid
- Why it matters: User gets too little, too much, or repeated help explaining an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 35 violations, 35 violators
Where was the issue found?
z-index not zero
- Why it matters: User cannot predict the effect of clicking
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 14 violations, 14 violators
Where was the issue found?

What you can do

Choose how to address these issues:

Do it yourself

Explore the issues, following the links above. Decide which issues are actual defects. Plan and implement corrections. Then retest the page.

Use artificial intelligence

Make Kilotest available to an AI assistant. Then give it a prompt like this:

Kilotest reports issues on the State of Oregon web accessibility web page. Describe them and propose a plan to resolve the genuine defects.

Issues reported for State of Oregon web accessibility

About the page

History

Issues reported

contrast poor

iframe not named

control not named

internal link broken

svg image not named

dialog not named

label reference invalid

list child invalid

script element invalidly deferred

attribute value invalid

parent invalid

input not named

aria attribute invalid

Tab-focusable elements wrong

aria reference invalid

attribute obsolete

form submission button missing

code obsolete

animation long or repetitive

element obsolete

hover indication poor

links named identically

links not grouped as nav

line height low

link indication poor

semantic properties represented with styles

adjacent links not combined

text contrast improvable

tab-opening link action unstated?

target small

content beyond landmarks

item makes testing inconclusive

button name not visible

title attribute empty

labeling risky

tabindex redundant

no default option

link destination not URL

image dubiously named

links dubiously share name

type redundant

aria-label on non-labelable role

image dubiously marked decorative

option groups not marked?

position sticky

text contrast not testable

image link text suspect

all-capital text

large visible-element count

text distortion

role assigned instead of implicit

inconsistent heading, link, or button styles

title attribute invalid

z-index not zero

What you can do

Do it yourself

Use artificial intelligence