Issues reported for CVS Health home

About the page

URL: https://www.cvshealth.com/
Tested 188 days ago on 2026-05-06 at 17:50 by job 260506T1748-q18
Rule engines: 10 called, 10 able to test, violations reported by 10
Results: 489 violations, 275 violators, 55 issues
Download the full technical report (JSON)

History

This is the only available report about the page.

Request a retest

Issues reported

Highest priority: 7

button not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a button
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 3 rule engines (HTML CodeSniffer + QualWeb + WAVE)
- Results: 3 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
no role-required name
- Why it matters: User cannot get help understanding an item
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
iframe not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topic of an embedded page
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
contrast poor
- Why it matters: Content is difficult to understand
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Axe)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
Where was the issue found?
attribute missing
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 17 violations, 17 violators
Where was the issue found?
attribute value invalid
- Why it matters: Item behaves improperly
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
link not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help understanding what a link points to
- Priority: highest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?

High priority: 13

heading empty
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on the topic of a part of the page
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.6
- Reported by 8 rule engines (Accessibility Checker + Alfa + ASLint + Axe + Editoria11y + Html Checker API + HTML CodeSniffer + QualWeb)
- Results: 8 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
form submission button missing
- Why it matters: User cannot easily submit a form
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.2
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer + QualWeb)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
Where was the issue found?
code obsolete
- Why it matters: Page contains code that is no longer standard
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
forms not distinctly named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
autocomplete invalid
- Why it matters: User cannot get help entering personal information in a form item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
negative text-indent
- Why it matters: Helper may hide content from a user
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 10 violations, 10 violators
Where was the issue found?
code invalid
- Why it matters: Invalid code in the page may prevent a helper from working
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 18 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
element closure invalid
- Why it matters: Page contains invalid code
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
element obsolete
- Why it matters: Page includes obsolete code that the browser may fail to process
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
box size absolute
- Why it matters: User cannot enlarge the content of an item for readability
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 26 violations, 26 violators
Where was the issue found?
element focusability and operability conflict
- Why it matters: Keyboard-only user cannot operate an item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
hover indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot explore the page reliably with a mouse
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 11 violations, 11 violators
Where was the issue found?
control has title instead of label
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how to operate a form item
- Priority: high
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?

Low priority: 7

line height low
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.8
- Reported by 2 rule engines (Alfa + Testaro)
- Results: 29 violations, 27 violators
Where was the issue found?
links named identically
- Why it matters: User cannot get help differentiating links
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 2 rule engines (QualWeb + Testaro)
- Results: 8 violations, 7 violators
Where was the issue found?
link href missing
- Why it matters: Helper cannot properly explain a link to a user
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 2 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
iframe sandbox attributes risky
- Why it matters: Page may be unsafe to use
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
heading structure illogical
- Why it matters: Helper misdescribes the page
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 2 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
link incomplete
- Why it matters: User may fail to reach a promised location
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
link indication poor
- Why it matters: User cannot differentiate a link from plain text
- Priority: low
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 35 violations, 35 violators
Where was the issue found?

Lowest priority: 28

text contrast improvable
- Why it matters: Content is not easy to understand
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.6
- Reported by 4 rule engines (Alfa + ASLint + Axe + HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 77 violations, 43 violators
Where was the issue found?
tab-opening link action unstated?
- Why it matters: Following a link opens a new window, possibly surprising a user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.5
- Reported by 3 rule engines (ASLint + HTML CodeSniffer + Testaro)
- Results: 36 violations, 34 violators
Where was the issue found?
content beyond landmarks
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
complementary not named
- Why it matters: User cannot get help on how some of the page is organized
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.6
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Accessibility Checker)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
target small
- Why it matters: User cannot reliably choose an item to click or tap
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.5.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Alfa)
- Results: 40 violations, 40 violators
Where was the issue found?
item makes testing inconclusive
- Why it matters: Item prevents a conclusive accessibility test
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Alfa)
- Results: 8 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
button name not visible
- Why it matters: User cannot get help explaining a button
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 6 violations, 5 violators
Where was the issue found?
fieldset missing?
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help recognizing a group of related form items
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
Where was the issue found?
link name vague
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand what a link points to
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
labeling risky
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand a form control
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
tabindex redundant
- Why it matters: Revision risks interfering with navigation by a keyboard-only user
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (ASLint)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
links dubiously share name
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help differentiating links
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Axe)
- Results: 2 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
type redundant
- Why it matters: Page includes unnecessary code
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 5 violations, 5 violators
Where was the issue found?
section heading missing
- Why it matters: User cannot understand the topic of a part of the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Html Checker API)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
image dubiously marked decorative
- Why it matters: Helper ignores an image that is apparently informative
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.1.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 10 violations, 10 violators
Where was the issue found?
position sticky
- Why it matters: User may be unable to see needed content or may be forced to scroll in both dimensions
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.10
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
text contrast not testable
- Why it matters: Text may be difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
- Reported by 1 rule engine (HTML CodeSniffer)
- Results: 4 violations, 4 violators
Where was the issue found?
label location dubious
- Why it matters: User may fail to notice the explanation of an item in a form
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.3.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (QualWeb)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
all-capital text
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 12 violations, 12 violators
Where was the issue found?
large visible-element count
- Why it matters: User cannot easily find items in the page
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
text distortion
- Why it matters: Text is difficult to read
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.1.5
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 2 violations, 2 violators
Where was the issue found?
double br use dubious
- Why it matters: User may be unable to get help to fully understand the text
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
role assigned instead of implicit
- Why it matters: User may misunderstand the purpose of an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1.2
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 42 violations, 42 violators
Where was the issue found?
inconsistent heading, link, or button styles
- Why it matters: User cannot easily distinguish items of different types
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 3.2.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 5 violations, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
title attribute invalid
- Why it matters: User gets too little, too much, or repeated help explaining an item
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.3.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 3 violations, 3 violators
Where was the issue found?
z-index not zero
- Why it matters: User cannot predict the effect of clicking
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 1.4
- Reported by 1 rule engine (Testaro)
- Results: 12 violations, 12 violators
Where was the issue found?
link to non-web resource
- Why it matters: Page points to harder-to-use resources
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?
noscript element not equivalent?
- Why it matters: User who has disabled JavaScript may be denied some content
- Priority: lowest
- Related WCAG standard: 4.1
- Reported by 1 rule engine (WAVE)
- Results: 1 violation, 1 violator
Where was the issue found?

What you can do

Choose how to address these issues:

Do it yourself

Explore the issues, following the links above. Decide which issues are actual defects. Plan and implement corrections. Then retest the page.

Use artificial intelligence

Make Kilotest available to an AI assistant. Then give it a prompt like this:

Kilotest reports issues on the CVS Health home web page. Describe them and propose a plan to resolve the genuine defects.

Issues reported for CVS Health home

About the page

History

Issues reported

button not named

no role-required name

iframe not named

contrast poor

attribute missing

attribute value invalid

link not named

heading empty

form submission button missing

code obsolete

forms not distinctly named

autocomplete invalid

negative text-indent

code invalid

element closure invalid

element obsolete

box size absolute

element focusability and operability conflict

hover indication poor

control has title instead of label

line height low

links named identically

link href missing

iframe sandbox attributes risky

heading structure illogical

link incomplete

link indication poor

text contrast improvable

tab-opening link action unstated?

content beyond landmarks

complementary not named

target small

item makes testing inconclusive

button name not visible

fieldset missing?

link name vague

labeling risky

tabindex redundant

links dubiously share name

type redundant

section heading missing

image dubiously marked decorative

position sticky

text contrast not testable

label location dubious

all-capital text

large visible-element count

text distortion

double br use dubious

role assigned instead of implicit

inconsistent heading, link, or button styles

title attribute invalid

z-index not zero

link to non-web resource

noscript element not equivalent?

What you can do

Do it yourself

Use artificial intelligence