Kilotest: Diagnoses of contrast poor violation by HTML element 567 on Off-ramp NYC page

Basics

About the page

• URL: https://www.offramp.nyc/
• Tested 8 days ago on 2026-10-02 at 17:16 by job 261002T1715-9f8
• Summary of results:
  • Rule engines:
    • Called: 12
    • Were able to test: 12
    • Reported any rule violations: 11
  • Violations: 962
  • Violators: 296
  • Issues: 43
• Download the full technical report (JSON)

About the issue

• Why it matters: Content is difficult to understand
• Priority: highest
• Related WCAG standard: 1.4.3
• Reported by 3 rule engines (Axe + HTML CodeSniffer + WAVE)
• Violations: 10
• Violators: 7

About the violator

• Tag name: STRONG
• Text: For far less than it would cost to rehabilitate, we can replace the BQE with tree-lined boulevards, new transit, and bike lanes for people and cargo.
• Start tag: <strong>
• XPath: [not obtained]
• Bounding box: x = 603, y = 4399, width = 1251, height = 150
• Reported by HTML CodeSniffer + WAVE

Take me there

Diagnoses

Here is how rule engines diagnose the contrast poor issue for HTML element 567 of the Off-ramp NYC page.

1. This element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 1:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #767676.

   Rule engine: HTML CodeSniffer (Squiz Labs)

   Rule: E-WCAG2AAA.Principle1.Guideline1_4.1_4_6.G18.Fail

2. Very low contrast

   Rule engine: WAVE (Utah State University)

   Rule: contrast